As discussed in today's workgroup, there are many cases, for example, of
in the 2.1 spec.
There are also many occurrences of "2.0" that should not only be 2.1, probably, but might require updated wording around them.
Rainer also mentioned something about making a statement that 2.1 implementations should accept 2.0 tickets and not do schema validation, so he said he wanted to consider that in his draft.
I even noticed one example that contained JDFSchema_1_1.
And there might be more on this general topic...
Table 1.1: CIP4 XJDF/XJMF Schema Locations
<update 2_0 to 2_1>
Table 6.57: Device Resource
@ JDFVersions: <Add 1.7 and 2.1 and move "this spec to 2.1>