-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Implemented (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Normal
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Fix Version/s: 1.7
-
Component/s: DeviceCaps
-
Labels:None
The description quoted below look total rubbish.
Name | Type | Description | Set | Tag | Documents |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TrapnetAnnotationPDFX | NMTOKENS | The PDF/X versions to which the @TrapNet annotation complies (e.g., "PDF/X-1a:2003"). | - | - |
Additional info from Dennis: My initial thought when I put this in the "Nits" FDF in JDF-545 was that "@TrapNet" in the Description field shown above is not an attribute, so was probably supposed to be "TrapNet" (in red and in quotes) from table 10.74 AnnotationType Attribute Values. That is, when @AnnotationType="TrapNet", then @TrapnetAnnotationPDFX is used. Although...why is TrapnetAnnotationPDFX required then?
TrapNetAnnotationPDFX ? | ... | The PDF/X versions to which the @AnnotationType="TrapNet"annotation complies (e.g., "PDF/X-1a:2003"). |
- relates to
-
JDF-545 Nits found in 1.6 when comparing 1.5 to 1.6, part 2
-
- Implemented
-